James v. Dicus et al
ORDER ADOPTING 52 the recommended disposition; granting 41 defendants' motion for summary judgment; and dismissing, without prejudice, Mr. James' discrimination and retaliation claims. Jurisdiction is not exercised over James' state law claim, and it is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/11/2013. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DONNIE B. JAMES
ADC # 89050
CASE NO. 4:11CV00901 BSM/BD
BRENDA DICUS et al.
The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth
Deere has been reviewed, and no objections have been filed. After carefully considering
the disposition and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the
recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety
in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
The defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 41] is granted and
Mr. James’s discrimination and retaliation claims are dismissed without prejudice.
Jurisdiction is not exercised over James’s state law claim, and it is
dismissed without prejudice.
An appropriate judgment shall accompany this order
DATED this 11th day of January 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?