James v. Dicus et al

Filing 53

ORDER ADOPTING 52 the recommended disposition; granting 41 defendants' motion for summary judgment; and dismissing, without prejudice, Mr. James' discrimination and retaliation claims. Jurisdiction is not exercised over James' state law claim, and it is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/11/2013. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DONNIE B. JAMES ADC # 89050 V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:11CV00901 BSM/BD BRENDA DICUS et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere has been reviewed, and no objections have been filed. After carefully considering the disposition and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 41] is granted and Mr. James’s discrimination and retaliation claims are dismissed without prejudice. 2. Jurisdiction is not exercised over James’s state law claim, and it is dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate judgment shall accompany this order DATED this 11th day of January 2013. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?