Herron v. Department of Education

Filing 9

ORDER finding as moot 4 Motion to Quash; finding as moot 4 Motion for Protective Order; finding as moot 1 Motion for Order and directing the Clerk to close the case. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 1/13/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ROBERT HERRON V. PLAINTIFF 4:11MC00038 JMM DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Inspector General DEFENDANT ORDER Pending is the Plaintiff’s Motion for Order pursuant to the Customer Challenge provisions of the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 and the Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum and Motion for Protective Order. The Defendant has responded. In the Response, the Defendant states that it is withdrawing the Subpoena at issue. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash and Motion for Protective Order (Docket #4) is MOOT. Further, because Plaintiff’s Challenge is based upon the Subpoena it appears that the initial Motion for Order (Docket #1) is also MOOT. In conclusion, the Defendant has withdrawn the Subpoena at issue in this case. Accordingly, the pending motions (Docket # 1 and # 4) are MOOT. The Clerk is directed to close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of January, 2012. ______________________________ James M. Moody United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?