Clark v. McCullough et al
ORDER denying 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint filed by Andrew W McCullough Estate through Holly McCullogh. However, the Court sua sponte extends the Estate's time to respond to the complaint until March 16, 2012 so the Estate can hire counsel. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/15/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
KENT McCULLOUGH; JOHN
McCULLOUGH; NANCY CLARK;
CHARLOTTE PENN; MAYAPPLE
McCULLOUGH ESTATE, Mark
Rushing, Personal Representative;
and ANDREW W. McCULLOUGH
ESTATE, Holly McCullough,
representative, Holly McCullough, has moved for more time to respond to the
complaint. Document No. 10. The motion is denied because McCullough is
not a lawyer and may not represent the Estate or file any court paper on its
behalf. In the circumstances, however, the Court sua sponte extends the
Estate's time to respond to the complaint until 16 March 2012 so the Estate can
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?