Clark v. McCullough et al

Filing 13

ORDER denying 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint filed by Andrew W McCullough Estate through Holly McCullogh. However, the Court sua sponte extends the Estate's time to respond to the complaint until March 16, 2012 so the Estate can hire counsel. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/15/12. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

WESTERN DIVISION

BRETT CLARK

PLAINTIFF

v.

No.4:12-cv-15-DPM

KENT McCULLOUGH; JOHN
McCULLOUGH; NANCY CLARK;
CHARLOTTE PENN; MAYAPPLE
McCULLOUGH ESTATE, Mark
Rushing, Personal Representative;
and ANDREW W. McCULLOUGH
ESTATE, Holly McCullough,
Personal Representative

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The

Andrew

W.

McCullough

Estate,

through

its

personal

representative, Holly McCullough, has moved for more time to respond to the
complaint. Document No. 10. The motion is denied because McCullough is
not a lawyer and may not represent the Estate or file any court paper on its
behalf. In the circumstances, however, the Court sua sponte extends the
Estate's time to respond to the complaint until 16 March 2012 so the Estate can
hire counsel.
So Ordered.

~~~---++---=-@:._­

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge