LaMere v. Pennington et al
Filing
88
ORDER denying pltf's 78 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 5/29/12. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
FRED MICHAEL LAMERE,
ADC #100444
v.
PLAINTIFF
4:12-cv-00048-KGB-JTK
BRUCE PENNINGTON, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 78). Defendants
filed a Response to the Motion (Doc. No. 86).
In his Motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to order Defendants to provide him medical records
and other documents he previously requested. Specifically, Plaintiff states he did not receive a
document referred to by Defendant Shelnut in her interrogatory response #5, and also documents
which relate to his disciplinary proceedings and “hole time.”
Defendants state they have provided Plaintiff all medical records and his complete jail file
on two separate occasions, and ask the Court to deny the Motion.
Based on Defendants’ Response that they have provided all documents to Plaintiff, the Court
will deny Plaintiff’s Motion. However, the Court requests that Defendants double-check their
records for the specific documents sought by Plaintiff. If they are located, Defendants shall forward
such to Plaintiff, along with notice to the Court. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 78) is
DENIED.
If more documents (as specified above) are located by Defendants, they shall
immediately forward such to the Plaintiff.
1
IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of May, 2012.
______________________________________
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?