Monaco v. Baker et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 granting 6 Motion to Dismiss filed by Pulaski County Circuit Court and dismissing the petition with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/27/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION FRED GUY MONACO, II v. PETITIONER No.4:12-cv-49-DPM-JTK i' PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, 2ND DIVISION" RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney's Proposed Findings and Recommendations, Document No.8. No one has objected. Having reviewed the proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (advisory committee notes to 1983 addition), and for legal error, the Court adopts the proposal as its own. Motion to dismiss, Document No.6, granted. Monaco's petition is dismissed with prejudice. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge ┬ĚThe Clerk is directed to correct the docket to reflect that the remaining respondents were terminated when petitioner dropped them from his amended petition on 2 March 2012. Document No.3.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?