Stuckey v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc et al
ORDER if pltf wishes to pursue this action against MERS, the only remaining deft, she is directed to notify the Court no later than 8/15/12; otherwise, her complaint may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/30/12. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.,
NO: 4:12CV00082 SWW
Plaintiff filed this lawsuit pro se on February 8, 2012. All the defendants except
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), responded with motions to dismiss
or for summary judgment. The Court granted the motions and dismissed those defendants by
order entered on April 9, 2012. On April 25, 2012, the Court directed the parties to file a Rule
26(f) report by July 2, 2012. No report has been filed.
Soon after she filed her complaint, the Court notified plaintiff that she is required to be
familiar with and comply with all Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as well as the Local Rules of
this Court. Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) provides that it is plaintiff’s duty to diligently prosecute her
case. Failure to do so can result in dismissal of the action.
If plaintiff wishes to pursue this action against MERS, the only remaining defendant1, she
is directed to notify the Court no later than August 15, 2012. Otherwise, her complaint may be
dismissed for failure to prosecute.
SO ORDERED this 30th day of July, 2012.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
The Court notes MERS has not answered or otherwise responded to plaintiff’s
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?