Nowden v. Roger et al

Filing 22

ORDER granting 18 Motion to Dismiss and dismissing plaintiff's Title VII claim with prejudice as to defts Rodger and Gray. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/11/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION SHARON NOWDEN I' v. PLAINTIFF No.4:12-cv-83-DPM JACOB RODGER, Administrator; DEMETRIA GRAY, Human Resources; and EMERITUS SENIOR LIVING DEFENDANTS ORDER Rodger and Gray move to dismiss Nowden's Title VII racediscrimination claim against them. Nowden has offered no response to the motion; and her time to do so has passed. The motion, Document No. 18, is granted. Rodger and Gray are not"employers" within the meaning of Title VII. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b). Rodger is an administrator at Emeritus; and Gray works in human resources. Emeritus itself was Nowden's employer for Title VII purposes. Nowden's Title VII claim is therefore dismissed with prejudice as to Rodger and Gray. So Ordered. b~~d//}-· I ,~>' D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge /1 ~ I' )..O/r

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?