Hentz v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting pltf's 10 Motion to Dismiss Case With Prejudice; finding as moot defts' 7 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/24/12. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ANTHONY HENTZ, SR.
ERIC SHINSEKI, ET AL.,
NO: 4:12CV00112 SWW
Order of Dismissal
Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion to dismiss with prejudice, stating the parties have
resolved all issues.1 Plaintiff adds a request that the Court retain jurisdiction over the terms of
the settlement agreement. In response, defendants state that retention of jurisdiction by the Court
was not one of the agreed terms of the settlement agreement and that there is no reason for the
Court to retain jurisdiction because no further action is required of defendants.
The Court finds plaintiff’s motion to dismiss with prejudice [docket entry 10] should be
and is hereby granted. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
DATED this 24th day of July, 2012.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing plaintiff’s complaint is barred by a
settlement agreement. In his motion to dismiss, plaintiff says defendants’ motion is moot. Because the
Court dismisses plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice and does not retain jurisdiction, defendants’ motion
[docket entry 7] is moot.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?