Murphy v. AT&T Inc et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting the Stipulation (which the Court construes as an unopposed motion for voluntary dismissal) and finding as moot 4 Motion to Dismiss. The Court will withhold entry of judgment until August 3, 2012. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/7/12. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

WESTERN DIVISION

AMELIA MURPHY

v.

PLAINTIFF
No.4:12-cv-118-DPM

AT&T INC.; AT&T CORPORATION;
EOS CCA; and ENHANCED RECOVERY
CORPORATION LLC

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Murphy's stipulation, Document No. 10, does not comply with Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(A) (ii). That provision requires" all parties
who have appeared" to sign the stipulation of dismissal. FED. R. CIV. P.
41 (a) (l)(A)(ii). In light of the parties' settlement, however, the Court will treat
the stipulation as an unopposed motion for voluntary dismissaL The motion
is granted; EOS CCA's motion to dismiss, Document No.4, is therefore denied
as moot. The Court will withhold entry of judgment until 3 August 2012. The
Court declines to retain jurisdiction for an indefinite period. If the parties
need more time to consummate their settlement, then they should so move
the Court before August 3rd.
So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge