Mitchell v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 23

ORDER if pltf opposes the 18 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim filed by Hewlett-Packard Company, he must do so on or before 5/1/12. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/24/12. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION BOYCE MITCHELL v. PLAINTIFF NO. 4:12CV00147 JLH HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY DEFENDANT ORDER On April 4, 2012, Hewlett-Packard Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. The time within which Boyce Mitchell should have responded has expired. See Local Rule 7.2 and Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If Boyce Mitchell opposes the motion to dismiss, he must file a response on or before May 1, 2012. If he fails to do so, the Court will assume that he does not oppose the motion and will act accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of April, 2012. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?