Mitchell v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filing
23
ORDER if pltf opposes the 18 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim filed by Hewlett-Packard Company, he must do so on or before 5/1/12. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/24/12. (vjt)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
BOYCE MITCHELL
v.
PLAINTIFF
NO. 4:12CV00147 JLH
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
DEFENDANT
ORDER
On April 4, 2012, Hewlett-Packard Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for
failure to state a claim. The time within which Boyce Mitchell should have responded has expired.
See Local Rule 7.2 and Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If Boyce Mitchell opposes
the motion to dismiss, he must file a response on or before May 1, 2012. If he fails to do so, the
Court will assume that he does not oppose the motion and will act accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of April, 2012.
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
