Humphrey v. Electrolux Home Products Inc

Filing 42

ORDER denying 30 Motion to Strike ; denying 39 Motion for Protective Order; deferring ruling on 28 Motion to Amend/Correct. Any supplemental authority is due by email to chambers as soon as possible. Joint report due by 3/22/13.. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/4/13. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION TAMMIE HUMPHREY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. PLAINTIFF No. 4:12-cv-157-DPM ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC. DEFENDANT ORDER Motion to strike, Document No. 30, denied without prejudice on the merits of the amendment issue. Motion to amend, Document No. 28, held in abeyance. The clarifying amendments about existing claims are unopposed, uncontroversial, and will be approved. Though the Court remains undecided, for the reasons stated on the record at the end of the 1 March 2013 hearing, the Court is inclined to deny Humphrey's request to abandon her national-class allegations in this case now. Any supplemental authority is due by email to chambers as soon as possible. Joint report due by 22 March 2013 on an agreed proposal for dealing with the overlapping issues in this case, Roberts, and McGowan, in a more efficient, more manageable, and more prudent way. The sooner the parties report, the better. The joint motion for protective order, Document No. 39, is granted. The Court appreciates the parties' work getting the proposed order in much better shape. So Ordered. -fi. J.!????1NLd.J/ D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 4 March2013 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?