Humphrey v. Electrolux Home Products Inc
ORDER denying 30 Motion to Strike ; denying 39 Motion for Protective Order; deferring ruling on 28 Motion to Amend/Correct. Any supplemental authority is due by email to chambers as soon as possible. Joint report due by 3/22/13.. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/4/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TAMMIE HUMPHREY, on behalf
of herself and all others similarly situated
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.
Motion to strike, Document No. 30, denied without prejudice on the
merits of the amendment issue. Motion to amend, Document No. 28, held in
abeyance. The clarifying amendments about existing claims are unopposed,
uncontroversial, and will be approved. Though the Court remains undecided,
for the reasons stated on the record at the end of the 1 March 2013 hearing, the
Court is inclined to deny Humphrey's request to abandon her national-class
allegations in this case now. Any supplemental authority is due by email to
chambers as soon as possible. Joint report due by 22 March 2013 on an agreed
proposal for dealing with the overlapping issues in this case, Roberts, and
McGowan, in a more efficient, more manageable, and more prudent way. The
sooner the parties report, the better. The joint motion for protective order,
Document No. 39, is granted. The Court appreciates the parties' work getting
the proposed order in much better shape.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?