Thomas v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et al
Filing
4
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-5) transferring this case to the Northern District of Georgia to be included In Re: Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Conserve Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2329. Signed by Jeffery N. Luthi, Clerk of the Panel, on 4/11/12. (kpr)
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTlDISTRICT LlTIGATION
IN RE: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY,
INC., CONSERVE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS
LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDL No. 2329
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANS.FER ORDER (CTO-S)
On February 8,2012, the Panel transferred 4 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Georgia for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28
U.S.c. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, 16 additional action(s) have been
transferred to the Northern District of Georgia. With the consent of that court, all such actions have
been assigned to the Honorable William SDuffey, Jr.
it appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Georgia and assigned to
Judge Duffey.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Ryles of Procedure of tile United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the
Northern District of Georgia for the reasons stated in the order of February 8, 2012, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable William S Duffey, Jr.
Liti~ation,
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall
be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. Ifany party tiles a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL:
Inasmuch as no objection is
pending allhis time, the
stay is lifted
Apr11,2012
CLERK'S OFFICE
UNiTED STATES
JUOI":;IAL PANGL ON
MULTID!STRJCT UTJGAnON
~~.-'-Jeffery N. LUthi
Clerk of the Panel
ATrEST: ATRUX COPY
CERTImID THIS
IN RE: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY,
INC., CONSERVE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS
LIABILITY LITIGATION
MOL No. 2329
SCHEDULE CTO-5 - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS
C,A,NO.
CASE CAPTION
ARKANSAS EASTERN
ARE
4
12-00174
Thomas v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et a1
LOUISIANA EASTERN
LAE
2
12-00440
Cowart v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN
MSS
3
12-00199
Cox et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et a1
WEST VIRGINIA NORTHERN
WVN
2
12-00022
Poling v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?