Smith v. Emerson et al
ORDER directing plaintiff to file, within 15 days of the entry of this Order, a response to the 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Joe Nutt and a separate Statement of Disputed Facts that complies with the instructions set forth in this Order and with the Local Rules of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 2/5/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
RICK EMERSON, et al.
Defendant Nutt filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, together with a Brief in Support and
Statement of Undisputed Facts on January 16, 2013 (Doc. Nos. 40-42). Plaintiff has not responded
to the Motion.
At the summary judgment stage, a plaintiff cannot rest upon mere allegations and, instead,
must meet proof with proof. See FED. R. CIV. P. 56(e). This means that Plaintiff’s Response must
include his legal arguments, as well as affidavits,1 prison records, or other evidence establishing that
there is a genuine issue of material fact that must be resolved at a hearing or trial.
Furthermore, pursuant to Local Rule 56.1, Plaintiff must also separately file a Statement of
Disputed Facts, which lists: (a) any disagreement he has with the specifically numbered factual
assertions contained in Defendants’ Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. No. 47); and (b) any
other disputed facts that he believes must be resolved at a hearing or trial.2
The affidavit must be based upon the personal knowledge of the person executing the affidavit and
must be either: (1) sworn and subscribed to by a notary public; or (2) executed under penalty of
perjury, as provided for by 28 U.S.C. § 1746.
If Plaintiff disputes any of the facts set forth in Defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Facts, he must
identify each numbered paragraph that contains the facts he disputes and, for each paragraph, explain
why he disputes those facts.
Finally, Plaintiff is advised that if he intends to rely upon grievances or records that have been
previously filed with the Court, he must specifically refer to those documents by docket number,
page, date, and heading. The Court will not sift through the file to find support for Plaintiff’s factual
contentions. See Crossley v. Georgia-Pacific, Corp., 355 F.3d 1112, 1113-14 (8th Cir. 2004)
(affirming the grant of summary judgment because a plaintiff failed to properly refer to specific pages
of the record that supported his position).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff must file, within fifteen days of the entry of the Order, a Response to
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and a separate Statement of Disputed Facts that
complies with FED. R. CIV. P. 56, Local Rule 56.1, and the instructions set forth in this Order.
Plaintiff is advised that the failure to timely and properly comply with this Order will
result in: (a) all of the facts set forth in Defendants’ summary judgment papers being deemed
admitted by Plaintiff, pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(c); or (b) the dismissal of this action, without
prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of February, 2013.
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?