Garrett v. Andrews et al
ORDER denying objection 134 filed by Jesse Lee Garrett to this Courts July 17, 2013 Order (Doc. No. 130) listing the witnesses to be allowed at his August 21, 2013 Evidentiary Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 8/13/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JESSE LEE GARRETT,
SGT. ANDREWS, et al.
Plaintiff Garrett has filed an Objection (Doc. No. 134) to this Court’s July 17, 2013 Order
(Doc. No. 130) listing the witnesses to be allowed at his August 21, 2013 Evidentiary Hearing.
Although Plaintiff states that five witnesses are “vital” to his case, he does not include a summary
of their expected testimony. Two of the these proposed witnesses, James Britt and Chris Smith,
were listed on his original witness request, but the summary of their expected testimony did not
relate to the incidents at issue in Plaintiff’s case. The other three witnesses – Ronald Britton, Randy
Gwatney, and Michael Furman – were not included on Plaintiff’s original witness request, and
Plaintiff does not offer any summary of their expected testimony. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Objection
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of August, 2013.
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?