DePriest v. Milligan
Filing
48
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion for Order to Quash. The Court directs plaintiff to file the appropriate motion to extend the discovery cutoff to permit plaintiff to take Mr. Meyer's deposition at a later time. The motion to quash the underlying subpoena, which the Court has not reviewed because it was not attached to Mr. Meyer's motion, is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/7/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
RONDA DEPRIEST
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 4:12-cv-00235 KGB
DENNIS MILLIGAN
DEFENDANT
ORDER
Before the Court is Rick Meyer’s motion to cancel deposition as scheduled and to quash
underlying subpoena (Dkt. No. 47). The motion is granted in part and denied in part. In Mr.
Meyer’s motion, he represents that plaintiff’s counsel will agree to postpone the deposition if the
Court extends the discovery cutoff in this matter to allow the deposition to be taken later. The
Court orders that Mr. Meyer’s deposition, currently scheduled for June 10, 2013, at 10:00 a.m.,
be postponed due to Mr. Meyer’s conflicting medical appointments. For good cause shown, Mr.
Meyer’s motion is granted to the extent that the motion requests his deposition be cancelled as
currently scheduled.
With this ruling, the Court makes clear that Mr. Meyer’s deposition should proceed at a
later date and time. Accordingly, the Court denies Mr. Meyer’s motion to the extent it seeks to
quash the underlying subpoena, which the Court has not reviewed because it was not attached to
Mr. Meyer’s motion.
The Court directs plaintiff to file the appropriate motion to extend the discovery cutoff to
permit plaintiff to take Mr. Meyer’s deposition at a later time, in accordance with the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court.
SO ORDERED this 7th day of June, 2013.
____________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?