Cruthis v. Vision's et al
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion to Compel. Separate defendant Visions is ordered to supplement its responses to Plaintiff Keyli Cruthis' First Set of Interrogatories and First Request for Production of Documents in light of the Court's Opinion and Order of August 7, 2013. Visions is ordered to supplement these responses within 14 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/7/13. (kpr) (Modified on 8/7/2013 to correct typographical error). (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
KEYLI CRUTHIS, CORTNY SPURLOCK,
and KRISTEN WHITWORTH
No. 4:12CV244 KGB
VISION’S, individually and d/b/a VISIONS and/or
d/b/a VISIONS CABARET; MINOR BOOTH, Individually
and d/b/a VISIONS and/or VISIONS CABARET
Plaintiffs’ motion to compel responses to discovery is granted in part and denied without
prejudice in part (Dkt. No. 50). Separate defendant Vision’s, individually and d/b/a Visions
and/or d/b/a Visions Cabaret (“Visions”), is ordered to supplement its responses to Plaintiff
Keyli Cruthis’ First Set of Interrogatories and Plaintiff Keyli Cruthis’ First Request for
Production of Documents in light of the Court’s Opinion and Order of August 7, 2013. Visions
is ordered to supplement these responses within 14 days of the date of this Order.
To the extent Visions continues to take legal positions in response to this discovery that
plaintiffs contend are unsupported in case law or inapplicable to the facts of this case, plaintiffs
may renew their motion to compel citing with specificity the discovery request and legal position
SO ORDERED this 7th day of August, 2013.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?