Durr v. Davis et al

Filing 28

ORDER granting 15 Motion to Compel. The USPS is directed to comply with the subpoena duces tecum issued out of this Court dated 10/25/12. Defts are directed to file a substituted motion to compel production of documents that redacts Ms. Murrel& #039;s personal information within seven days of the date of this Order. After defts submit the substituted motion, the Clerk is directed to remove dkt. no. 15 from the public record and replace it with the substituted motion. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 2/21/13. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
OTIS DURR
v.

PLAINTIFF
Case No. 4:12-cv-272-KGB

SHALON DAVIS, MANAGER AT WORLEY’S
PLACE APARTMENTS; ELDERLY HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS CORPORATION;
AND JACKSONVILLE GARDENS, INC.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Before the Court is defendants’ motion to compel the production of documents from the
United States Postal Service (“USPS”) (Dkt. No. 15). There has been no response. Following a
hearing on January 16, 2013, the Court took the motion under advisement. The motion to compel is
granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c)(2)(B)(i). The USPS is ordered to produce the following
information or documentation within 60 days of the date of this Order: (1) the home address
provided to USPS by Marylene Murrel for the period January 1, 2009, to present; (2) a listing of
Ms. Murrel’s spouses, fiancés, significant others, etc., and emergency contacts she provided USPS
for the period January 2009 to the present; (3) Ms. Murrel’s USPS employment application; and (4)
Ms. Murrel’s résumé. By this Order, the Court is directing the USPS to comply with the subpoena
duces tecum issued out of this Court dated October 25, 2012, within 60 days of the date of this
Order (See Dkt. No. 15-1, at 3-5).
By separate order, the Court will enter the protective order proposed by defendants, with
slight modifications. All documents and information produced by the USPS pursuant to the order
regarding Ms. Murrel shall be produced as protected information subject to that protective order.
Also, defendants are directed to file a substituted motion to compel production of documents
that redacts Ms. Murrel’s personal information in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a) within
seven days of the date of this Order. After defendants submit the substituted motion that complies

with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a), the Clerk of Court is directed to remove Dkt. No. 15 from the public
record and replace it with the substituted motion.
SO ORDERED this the 21st day of February, 2013.

______________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge

2