Cox v. Momar Incorporated et al

Filing 24

ORDER withdrawing the entire reference to the Bankruptcy Court 22 . This Court will take up the pending motion for partial summary judgment. A new scheduling order setting this matter for jury trial will be entered by separate order. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/28/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RICHARD L. COX, TRUSTEE v. PLAINTIFF No. 4:12-cv-00331 KGB MOMAR, INCORPORATED AND JOHN DOE I, II, AND III DEFENDANTS ORDER This matter was filed as an adversary proceeding in the Affiliated Foods bankruptcy, which is currently pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. It is one of many actions brought by plaintiff Richard L. Cox, the Chapter 7 trustee, to avoid allegedly preferential transfers. By order dated May 31, 2012, the bankruptcy court transferred the case to this Court upon defendant Momar, Incorporated’s (“Momar”) request for a jury trial. Momar does not consent to having the bankruptcy judge preside over the trial of this matter, and it has not filed a proof of claim in the bankruptcy action. In an order dated October 31, 2012, this Court found that judicial economy would be served by the bankruptcy court conducting all pretrial proceedings and concluded that the bankruptcy court would maintain the reference until the time of trial. The Court directed the bankruptcy court to notify this Court when the matter was ready for trial. The Court now withdraws the entire reference immediately. This Court will take up the pending motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 5). A new scheduling order setting this matter for jury trial will be entered by separate order. SO ORDERED this 28th day of November, 2012. ____________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?