Murry v. Arkansas Children's Hospital et al
ORDER dismissing Murry's claims against defendants Batchelor and Winslow with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/8/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL;
LORI BATCHELOR and MARK WINSLOW
Murry asked the Court to reconsider dismissing his claims against
Batchelor and Winslow for lack of service. Document Nos. 13 & 14. It has.
Document No. 15. Murry says the hospital told him they would serve their
employees. Document Nos. 14 & 18. The hospital says it has no record of this
conversation with Murry. Document No. 16. Although these circumstances
present a factual dispute about service, it is moot because, as Arkansas
Children's Hospital correctly notes, individuals are not proper defendants in
Title VII discrimination suits. Lenhardt v. Basic Institute of Tech., Inc., 55 F.3d
377, 381 (8th Cir. 1995). Murry's claims against defendants Batchelor and
Winslow are therefore dismissed with prejudice.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?