Fitzgerald v. McHan et al

Filing 7

ORDER adopting the proposed findings and recommended disposition; dismissing Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice; directing plaintiff to submit within 30 days of the entry of this order: (a) the statutory filing fee of $350, in full, to the clerk, noting the case style and number; and (b) file a motion to reopen the case if he wishes to continue this case. It is CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/31/2012. (hph)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION NATHANIEL L. FITZGERALD, ADC # 84210 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:12CV00378 BSM/JJV TOM McHAN, Major, Ouachita River Unit, ADC; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and the filed objections have been reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff Nathaniel Fitzgerald’s complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the three strikes rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 2. If Fitzgerald wishes to continue this case, he must submit within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order: (a) the statutory filing fee of $350, in full, to the clerk, noting the case style and number; and (b) file a motion to reopen the case. 3. It is CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 31st day of July 2012. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?