Slayton v. Bailey et al

Filing 15

ORDER directing plaintiff to file an updated motion to proceed ifp within 15 days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff shall also file a response to the 10 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Bailey within 15 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/28/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RONNY JOE SLAYTON v. PLAINTIFF 4:12-cv-00475-JTK CAPTAIN BAILEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Ronny Slayton originally filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 while incarcerated at the Grimes Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) (Doc. No. 2). His Motion to Proceed in this action in forma pauperis was granted by Order dated August 15, 2012 (Doc. No. 3). However, Slayton has notified the Court of a change in his address which reflects his release from incarceration (Doc. No. 12). Therefore, in order to continue the prosecution of this action, Slayton must file an updated Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. In addition, he must file a Response to Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 10). Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff Slayton shall file an updated Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis within fifteen days of the date of this Order. Failure to file such shall result in the dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff’s Complaint. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). The Clerk is hereby directed to forward an in forma pauperis application to Plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a Response to Defendant Bailey’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 10) within fifteen days of the date of this Order. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of November, 2012. ________________________________ JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?