Hill et al v. Southwestern Energy Company

Filing 127

ORDER denying the request for production of background information. Plaintiffs can explore these issues in detail during deposition. Request for extension of deadlines denied: the parties must find a mutually convenient date for the deposition on the current timetable. The Court has just amended the Scheduling Order and declines to do so again absent extraordinary circumstances. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/12/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ROBBIE HILL; GWENNA HILL; JOSEPH SMITH; CATHERINE SMITH; KATHY L. HAMILTON; JERRY VAN WORMER; RANDY PALMER; JOYCE PALMER; LARRY KING; MARGARET KING; ADAM KOFOID; BRADLEY HOPPER; CRYSTAL HOPPER; COREY WARDEN; JULIE WARDEN; DALE STROUD; KARl STROUD; and BEVERLY STRAIN EADS, Trustee of Beverly Strain Eads Revocable Living Trust v. PLAINTIFFS No. 4:12-cv-500-DPM SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY COMPANY; XTO ENERGY; and SEECO INC. DEFENDANTS ORDER Joint report, NQ 125, noted. After much discussion, and consideration of alternatives, the interrogatories and related Rule 30(b)(6) deposition were the agreed resolution. Request for production of background information denied. Plaintiffs can explore these issues in detail during the deposition. SEECO' s answers provide Plaintiffs enough information to use in preparation with Plaintiffs' expert. If raw seismic data turns out after the deposition to be critical, we'll revisit the issue along the lines discussed at the hearing. Request for extension of deadlines denied: the parties must find a mutually convenient date for the deposition on the current timetable. The Court has just amended the Scheduling Order and declines to do so again absent extraordinary eire urns tances. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge / ,). /1Vf:q 1/S / / -2- cJ.N t/

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?