Hill et al v. Southwestern Energy Company
ORDER granting 77 Motion for Joinder. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/10/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ROBBIE HILL; GWENNA HILL;
JOSEPH SMITH; CATHERINE SMITH;
KATHY L. HAMILTON; JERRY VAN WORMER;
RANDY PALMER; JOYCE PALMER; LARRY KING;
MARGARET KING; ADAM KOFOID;
BRADLEY HOPPER; CRYSTAL HOPPER;
COREY WARDEN; and JULIE WARDEN
SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY COMPANY;
and XTO ENERGY
Unopposed motion for joinder, Ng 77, granted. The Court agrees,
applying Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19, that SEECO must be joined as a
defendant. Whether the case should remain here, though, is unclear.
The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U .S.C.
§ 1367. The RICO claim was marginal; and it's gone from the case. The trend
in the precedent is for the trial court not to exercise jurisdiction in these
circumstances, especially given that this case is still in early days and the
state-law issues are unsettled. E.g., Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp., 581 F.3d
737, 749 (8th Cir. 2009).
The Court agrees with Southwestern that the basics for CAF A
jurisdiction exist: minimal diversity and amount in controversy. 28 U.S.C.
§ 1332(d)(2). The Court is concerned-and as yet uninformed by pleading,
briefing, or proof- about whether the Court must decline to exercise
28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(4)(A) or § 1332(d)(4)(B) or should
decline under § 1332(d)(3). The parties should come prepared to address
jurisdiction first at the 19 December 2013 status conference.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
10 December 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?