King v. Woods

Filing 7

ORDER approving and adopting 6 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; dismissing 2 Plaintiff Christopher King's complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of the complaint co nstitutes a strike within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/5/2013. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER KING, SR.
ADC #651077
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO: 4:12CV00508 BSM

ALICE WOODS

DEFENDANT
ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 6] submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been reviewed. No objections have been
filed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is found that the
proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Plaintiff Christopher King’s compliant [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed with prejudice

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
2.

Dismissal of the complaint constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the

Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g).
3.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma

pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 5th day of February 2013.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE