Smith v. ConAgra Frozen Foods Inc et al
Filing
54
CERTIFICATION ORDER, purs to Rule 6-8 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas, this Court certifies to the Supreme Court of Arkansas a question of law that may be determinative of this case. The Clerk is hereby directed to forward this Order to the Supreme Court of Arkansas under his official seal. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/4/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
PLAINTIFF
TANYA SMITH
No. 4:12-cv-517-DPM
v.
CONAGRA FOODS, INC. and
TERRY STEEN
DEFENDANTS
CERTIFICATION ORDER
Which statute of limitation applies to employment-related retaliation
claims under the Arkansas Civil Rights Act will resolve important issues in
this case.
Tanya Smith worked for ConAgra.
She says the company
discriminated against her and fired her for taking sick leave and requesting
an accommodation upon her return.
She brought employment-based
retaliation and discrimination claims against ConAgra. The discrimination
claim, which had a one-year statute of limitation, was dismissed as
time-barred.
ARK. CODE ANN. § 16-123-107(c)(3).
She also asserts an
employment-based retaliation claim against her former supervisor, Terry
Steen. ARK. CODE ANN. § 16-123-108. This provision, however, contains no
explicit limitation period for the employment-related retaliation claims.
ConAgra says that the Court should look to the one-year limit in§ 16-123107(c)(3). Smith argues that the three-year statute applies - the provision
that catches all statutory causes of action that otherwise have no limitation
period. ARK. CODE ANN. § 16-56-105. No Arkansas precedent decides
between these statutory options. Crites v. Cowan, 2011 Ark. App. 11.
Here is the timeline:
•
February or March 2010
ConAgra terminated Smith and
allegedly discriminated against her.
•
20 July 2010
Smith filed a complaint with the EEOC
against only ConAgra, not Terry Steen.
•
29 August 2011
EEOC closed the case and issued a rightto-sue letter.
•
29 November 2011
Smith filed her first lawsuit in Pulaski
County.
•
28 March 2012
The 120-day limit to serve ConAgra and
Steen ended. Neither was served.
Smith says she tried to serve Steen, but
could not find him.
•
26 April2012
Smith non-suited the complaint.
•
7May 2012
Smith filed the current action in Pope
County, Arkansas.
•
18 August 2012
ConAgra removed the case to Federal
Court.
•
17 September 2012
After this Court granted a motion to
extend time for service, Smith served
Steen.
-2-
Smith's retaliation claims against ConAgra and Steen are untimely if the
one-year statute of limitation applies. ARK. CODE ANN.§ 16-123-107(c)(3). If
the three-year statute applies, her claims are timely. ARK. CODE ANN. § 16-56105. The Arkansas savings statute, ARK. CODE ANN. § 16-56-126, does not
benefit Smith because there was no completed but imperfect service in the
.original Pulaski County action. Clouse v. Ngau Van Tu, 101 Ark. App. 260,274
S.W.3d 344 (2008). Her retaliation claims therefore rise or fall depending on
the applicable statute of limitation.
The Court therefore certifies the following question, subject to the
Arkansas Supreme Court's power to reformulate it:
Are employment-related retaliation claims under the Arkansas
Civil Rights Act, ARK. CODE ANN. § 16-123-108, subject to the
one-year statute of limitation provided in another part of the Act,
ARK. CODE. ANN. § 16-123-107(c), or the three-year limitation
period applicable when a statutory cause of action contains no
limitation period? ARK. CODE ANN. § 16-56-105; Chalmers v.
Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc., 326 Ark. 895, 901, 935 S.W.2d 258,
261 (1996).
-3-
Counsel for Tanya Smith
Counsel for ConAgra Foods Inc.
Luther O'Neal Sutter
Sutter & Gillham, PLLC
Post Office Box 2012
Benton, AR 72018
Brittany M. Ems
Husch Blackwell - St. Louis
190 Carondelet Plaza
Suite 600
St. Louis, MO 63105
Josef S. Glynias
Husch Blackwell - St. Louis
190 Carondelet Plaza
Suite 600
St. Louis, MO 63105
Carolyn B. Witherspoon
Cross, Gunter, Witherspoon &
Galchus, P.C.
Post Office Box 3178
Little Rock, AR 72203-3178
-4-
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
1
-5-
lefrnrtMY J20l
I
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?