Hutchinson v. Pulaski County
ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and dismissing 2 Complaint filed by Christopher C Hutchinson without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Dismissal counts as a "strike," and the Court certifies that an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/8/12. (kpr) (Docket entry modified on 11/9/2012 to correct the file date.)(thd).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CHRISTOPHER C. HUTCHINSON
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and the plaintiff’s objections. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted
in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
The complaint (Dkt. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of the complaint constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2012.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?