Buchanan v. Mullins et al
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety 5 Report and Recommendations; dismissing 4 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; considering the dismissal a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and accompanying Judgment dismissing this action will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/11/2012. (dmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CARL LEE BUCHANAN,
VESTA MULLINS, et al.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that;
Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED, for failure
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
This dismissal is considered a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison
Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the
accompanying Judgment dismissing this action will not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. §
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of December, 2012.
JAMES M. MOODY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?