Long v. Reynolds et al
ORDER approving and adopting 10 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing 2 Plaintiff's complaint; dismissing Plaintiff's claims against all Defendants othe r than Defendant David L. Reynolds, without prejudice; dismissing Plaintiff's claims against Reynolds with prejudice; denying as moot all pending motions; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 10/10/2012. (dmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
MICHAEL LONG, JR.
NO: 4:12CV00647 BRW
DAVID L. REYNOLDS et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court
concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED.
Plaintiff’s claims against all Defendants other than Defendant David L. Reynolds
are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Plaintiff’s claims against Reynolds are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 10th day of December, 2012.
/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?