Allen et al v. Bass et al
ORDER adopting 6 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; dismissing, without prejudice, 1 plaintiff's complaint; and denying as moot all pending motions. Dismissal of the complaint constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform ACT, 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/25/2013. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
MICHAEL EDWARD ALLEN and
CASE NO. 4:13CV00068 BSM
ESTER BASS, et al.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 6] submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Joe Volpe have been reviewed. No objections have been
filed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is found that the
proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiffs’ complaint is dismissed without prejudice.
Dismissal of the complaint constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the
Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g).
It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma
pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
Dated this 25th day of April 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?