Moore v. Eberhard
Filing
19
ORDER adopting in their entirety the 15 Report and Recommendations as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing Mr. Moore's petition for writ of habeas corpus; denying the relief sought; denying the certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/11/2014. (mmd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
OLANDIS MOORE
v.
PETITIONER
Case No. 4:13-cv-00074 KGB
DAVID EBERHARD, Director,
Arkansas Department of Community
Corrections: Parole and Probation
RESPONDENT
ORDER
The Court has received proposed Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate Judge
H. David Young (Dkt. No. 15). After careful review of those Findings and Recommendations,
the objections and amended objections received thereto (Dkt. Nos. 16, 17), and a de novo review
of the record, the Court concludes that the Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby
are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. Olandis
Moore’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed, and the relief sought is denied (Dkt. No.
2). Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States
District Courts, the Court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final
order adverse to an applicant. A certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has
made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Id; 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
The Court finds no issue on which petitioner has made a substantial showing of a denial of a
constitutional right. Thus, the certificate of appealability is denied.
SO ORDERED this 11th day of March, 2014.
________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?