Hare v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston et al

Filing 44

ORDER applauding the parties' efforts in regards to the settlement. If the parties need any further relief, they should first move to reopen. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/8/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RUTH ANN HARE v. PLAINTIFF No. 4:13-cv-87-DPM LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE CO. OF BOSTON; L'OREAL USA INC.; and L'OREAL USA LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN DEFENDANTS ORDER In October 2013, this Court entered Judgment, vacating Liberty Life's denial of Hare's long-term disability benefits, and remanding the case to Liberty Life for reconsideration. NQ 32-1. A few months ago, Liberty Life advised the Court that its review was complete. NQ 40. Hare disagreed. NQ 41. Neither party moved to reopen the case, nor moved for any other relief. The parties have now advised the Court informally that the matter has settled. The Court applauds the parties' efforts. The case though, in this Court's eyes, remains closed. If the parties need any further relief, they should first move to reopen. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. 7 United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?