Davis et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation

Filing 15

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1) transferring the case to the District of Minnesota to be included in MDL No. 2441, In Re: Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. Signed by Jeffery N. Luthi, Clerk of the Panel, on 6/26/13. (kpr)

Case MDL No.

2441 Document 181

Filed 06/26113 Paoe 1 of 4

UNITtrD STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on

MULTIDISTRJCT LITIGATION

IN RE: STRYKER REJUVEN.ATE AND ABG
HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION

II
MDL No.244l

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO _T)

civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
District of Minnesota for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
$ 1407. ,9ee F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2013). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been
transferred to the District of Minnesota. With the consent ofthat court, all such actions have been
assigned to the Honorable Donovan W Frank.
On June l?.2013. the Panel transferred 28

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the District of Minnesota and assigned to Judge
Frank.
ofthe Rules ofProcedure ofthe United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litiqation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. $ 1407 to the
District of Minnesota for the reasons stated in the order ofJune 12.2013- and. with the consent of
Pursuant to Rule 7.1

that court, assigrred to the Honorable Donovan W Frank.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office ofthe Clerk ofthe United States
District Court for the District of Minncsota. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be
stayed 7 days from the enlry thereof. Ifany party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch !s no objedion is
panding at thi6lims, th8
stay is lifted.

FORTHE PANEL:

Jun 26, 20'13
CLERK'S OFFICE
(rNtTEO

JrJOtClAt-

tt

tEs

P l,tEt

Oa{

Jeffery N. Liithi
Clerk ofthe Panel

MULI|oISIRICI UNGAITOIJ

A true

sheet(s)

Case MDL No.

2441

Document

181

IN RE: STRYKER REJUVENATE AND ABG
HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION

SCHEDULE CTO-I

DIST

DIV.

C.A.NO.

Filed 06126113 Paoe 2 of 4

II
MDL No.244l

- TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

CASE CAPTION

ALABAMA NORTITERN

l3

ALN

00730

Davis v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation

l3Lt

lf

-:

7

ARIZONA
AZ

2

l3-00783

A:Z

2

13-00909

Rodriguez et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Perala etal v. Stryker Corporation et al l5c-" tf-/1

8c v t d] b

ARKANSAS EASTERN
AR-E

ARE
ARE
ARE
AR-E

ARE
ARE
ARE
ARE
ARE

4
4
4

13-001l2
13 001 l3

4

13-001 15
13-00127
13 00r28

4
4
4
4
4
4

r3-001l4

l3-00129

AR-E

4

13-00188
13-00189
13-00190
13-00191

ARE
ARE
ARE
ARE
ARE
ARE
ARE
ARE
ARE
ARE
ARE
ARE

4

€-ee+98

4

13-00200
13-00222
13 00223

4
4
4
4
4

4
4
4
4
4

t3-00226
13-00221

l3-00239
l3-00240
3-00241
13-00242
13 00255
|

l3-00308

Davis et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation r3c,r /f8o
Hogan et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation t3 c/ i tb \
Saunders et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporationl3cv zfBj
Qualls et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation /3@ tsg 3
Torbett et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporationl3cv /{0t1
Reaves et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation /Jcv iSBlTobias v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation t )c,tt9BG
Keisler v. Ilowmedica Osteonics Corporation /]cv r fUl
Bausom et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation /Jc" /tgB
Clemons et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporationilc" 19-84.
Miller et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Colporation /3cr /s1o
Williams ," Hervmediea Osteenies €orporetion vacated 06i 19i 13
Lybrand v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al /Jc" /5 a I
King et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation lStv r g7J
Wilson et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation / ict tfi3
Gaines et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation/ir " r s ?'-1
Langston et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation r 5cv 1S J5McClendon et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation llol ,5'1b
Dressler et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation l3<: tf"l'l
Pruett et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation t*,.! tg</g
Frederick et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation , 3c..t i f71
jc" &c\)
Baf l v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation s14l
Lemmonds v. Howmedica Osteonics Comoration t3qv lLo \

Case MDL No. 2441- Document

ARE

5

13-001

I

6

l8L

Filed 06126113 Page 3 of 4

Gladden v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | 3c"

I

60)

ARKANSAS WESTERN
ARW
ARW

4
6

13-04039
13-06040

Bounds et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation llcv 1G0 3
Hawfey v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation /]cv /Go{

CALIFORNIA CENTRAL

cAC

I

t3-00724

Maureen Redfield v. Howmedica Osteonics
Comoration et al

13

t ,t ibo-l

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

cAE

2

13-00690

Petersen et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. dlb/a

t

Strvker Orthooaedics

)

s

11op!

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

|3

13-01556
13-01557
13-01558
13-01559

Berg et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporationl3cv tt"t I
Anders et al v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp. t )cv lbt 9
Schulz v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp./ 3cv /(a/sSadowski v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp. / 5cv lall
Brown et al v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp. t 3cv ibt 1
Chaney et al v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp.t3c't rt-l I
Dahlgren et al v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp. ilc, /o JJ
Davis v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp. t Jct l2,St1
Dreyfus et al v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp. / 3(\/ /Q,)L
Martin v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp. 13a 'r / L)tJ
Rucker v. HowMedica Osteonics Com. t 3.v lt 3\

l3-00088

WILKERSON v. STRYKER CORPORATION

01545

l3-O1547

13 01548

t3

01549

13-01550
13-01551

t3-01552

GEORGIA MIDDLE

GAM 5

etal

ikv

l<.32

ILLINOIS NORTHERN

ILN
ILN
ILN
ILN
ILN
iLN
ILN

I
1
I
I
I
|
l

13-02899
13-03396
13-03397
13-03398
13-03539
13 03757
13 03934

Berg v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation l3 ct t t , 3Ll
Turpin v. Ilowmedica Osteonics Corporation t\cv te,3G
Schuetz v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation, d,b./a ,9 r." 16 ja
Stryker Orthopaedics
Bezely v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation / )c r' | e J1
Wolford v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation)\ c " tteLlo
Staggs v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation l3& tbql
Chivari v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporationr\c" tb,l L

LOUISIANA EASTERN
LAE
LAE

2
2

13 00523
t3-04751

MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN

al

1.u I G"l3
Washington v. Stryker Corporation et al i tLl /tolcl
Castay v. Stryker Corporation et

I

Case MDL No.

MSS 2

13

2441 Document 181

00007

Filed 06126113 Paoe 4 of 4

Harden v. Howmedica Osteonics

Com. \3

u

lboL(

NEW JERSEY

}l+213-02geffiVacated06/26/13
l\r

z

I

t-rtr+

/o

r\r

z

|

1-ttL+I

t

WEISBERG et al v. HOWMEDICAOSTEONICS r3cur{pot

coRPoRATloN

MARINELLO er al v. HoWMEDICA OSTEONI6S /Jq'
coRPoRATIoN

71,'rQ,

NJ213_o248oU|loobuffietalv.HoWMEDICAOSTEONICSl]cvlbtt:

r\J
Nl |

!
1

NU

tr'uz+dt
11
r

.r\1A\t1

?-n?{oo

|

)

Nl

)

r^e
jr_n?r60

r\r

z

|

r\J
N|

z
,

tr u)zz+
r r_n?r.){

N

.r-n?

5-us

1'!'

RANZENHOFER v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS t3 c v

1

13-02255

coRPoRATroN
TORR-ES v' HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS r3'v
coRPoRATloN

tbnl

DUROCHER v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS t3c,L
CORPORATION

lb)1

Barcliff v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation 13,-u jA3o

NEW YORK SOUTHERN

NYS

7

13-03001

Brown etal v. Stryker Corporation

13-01068

Cramer

91

a1

tlc,

llaZS

OHIO NORTHERN

oHN

3

v' Strvker Comoration

et

al rluv lb 39

WEST VIRGINIA SOUTHERN

WVS

2

13

04773

t2

WOODHULL v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS l\c\/ lGtL[
CORPORATION
HUXHOLD etal v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS l3cv lalA
CORPORATION
LITTLE et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS r3 t ' iorb
CORPORATION
BEANBLOSSOM v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS l3,ulb)ts
CORPORATION
HILLARD v. HoWMEDICA 6STE6NICS l )cv lba s_

NEW YORK EASTERN

NYE

tG

coRPoRATIoN

Holly v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation

llcvl6)-)