Barnett v. Americom Bank et al

Filing 64

ORDER ADOPTING 55 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; therefore, pltf's motions to amend 48 and for joinder 41 are GRANTED; defts Americom Bank and Direct Express Payment Processing Services are dismissed without prejudice from this c ase; Comerica Inc is added as the lone deft; pltf's motions for default judgment against Americom and Direct Express 27 , to amend his motion for default judgment 30 , for the entry of a clerk's default 35 , and for preliminary injunction 54 are DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/25/13. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION MATTHEW W. BARNETT v. PLAINTIFF NO. 4:13CV00347 SWW AMERICOM BANK and DIRECT EXPRESS PAYMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received findings and a recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young. After a careful review of the findings and recommendation, the timely objections received thereto, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. The motions to amend and for joinder filed by plaintiff Matthew W. Barnett (“Barnett”) are granted. See Document 41, 48. Defendants Americom Bank (“Americom”) and Direct Express Payment Processing Services (“Direct Express”) are dismissed without prejudice from this case. Comerica, Inc., is added as the lone defendant. In addition, Barnett’s motions for default judgment against Americom and Direct Express, to amend his motion for default judgment, for the entry of a clerk’s default, and for preliminary injunction are denied. See Document 27, 30, 35, 54. IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of October 2013. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?