Walker v. Shock et al
ORDER approving 19 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition and adopting in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 7 motion to dismiss with prejudice. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and the Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/4/2014. (mmd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
Case No. 4:13CV00452 KGB
ANDY SHOCK et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 19). No objections have been
filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court
concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted (Dkt. No. 7), and plaintiff David
Walker’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
SO ORDERED this the 4th day of March, 2014.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?