DuBois v. Ware et al

Filing 73

ORDER adopting 70 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 65 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with respect to his claims against Robinson. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in all other respects. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 6/17/2014. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION BEAU LEE DUBOIS ADC #153331 V. PLAINTIFF NO: 4:13CV00465 SWW DAVID ROBERT WARE et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Vesta Mullins, Alushia Robinson, and David Robert Ware (docket entry #65) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED. 2. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with respect to his claims against Robinson. 3. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in all other respects. 4. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. DATED this 17th day of June, 2014. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?