Reed v. Soto et al

Filing 44

ORDER ADOPTING 41 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; granting 35 Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissing plaintiff's complaint, without prejudice; certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith; and denying all other pending motions as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/8/2014. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER NEIL REED ADC #154916 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO: 4:13CV00530 BSM ALICIA SOTO et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc No. 35] is granted, and plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice. 2. It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. 3. All other pending motions are denied as moot. DATED this 8th day of September 2014. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?