Glaze et al v. Does et al
ORDER ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; dismissal of this action constitutes a "STRIKE"; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/21/13. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CHARIELL ALI GLAZE,
ADC #147919, et al.
DOES, Board of Regents, et al.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney.
After a review of those proposed findings and
recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the
record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice, based on
res judicata and sovereign immunity, and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison
Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment
dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2013.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?