Bryant v. USA
ORDER DISMISSING CASE as frivolous. All pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/30/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DONALD A. BRYANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bryant has filed another case about his tax problems. Bryant v. Internal
Revenue Service, 4:10-cv-1175-JLH (E.D. Ark. 2010); Bryant v. Internal Revenue
Service,4:10-cv-1978-BSM (E. D. Ark. 2010); Bryantv. Texas Lottery Commission,
4:10-cv-2039-SWW (E.D. Ark. 2010); Bryant v. Texas Lottery Commission, 4:11cv-51-DPM (E. D. Ark. 2011); Bryant v. United States ofAmerica, 4:13-cv-00376KGB (E.D. Ark. 2013); Bryant v. United States of America, 4:13-cv-424-DPM
(E.D. Ark. 2013). The Court ordered Bryant to file an amended petition
clarifying his claims and allegations. NQ 5. He filed more papers. NQ 6 & 7.
Bryant also wrote a letter directly to me, which I had the Clerk file. NQ 8.
On screening, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), Bryant's amended petition and all
his papers fail to state a claim. NQ 6, 7, & 8. As best the Court can understand,
Bryant is still trying to litigate issues decided against him with prejudice in
the earlier cases. Bryant v. Texas Lottery Commission, 4:11-cv-51-DPM, NQ 31
(E.D. Ark. 16 March 2011 ). Case dismissed as frivolous. All pending motions
are denied as moot.
D.P. Marshall Jr. (/
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?