Moore v. Shock et al
Filing
77
ORDER adopting 75 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 72 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's 2 complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/29/2014. (ks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
DAVID P. MOORE, SR.
ADC # 112305
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 4:13CV00594 JLH-JJV
ANDY SHOCK, Sheriff,
Faulkner County; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all
respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED (Document #72);
2.
Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice; and
3.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 29th day of October, 2014.
__________________________________
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?