Strong v. Hobbs et al
ORDER ADOPTING 30 Report and Recommendations and granting Defendants' 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court shall alter the docket to reflect that Defendant "Lucky Abulimen" is properly "Lucky Abhulimen," a nd Defendant "J. McKenney" is properly "Gregory McKinney." Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Abhulimen, Hamilton and McKinney are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/4/2014. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
RAY HOBBS, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. After carefully considering the objections and
making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this
Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
The Clerk of Court shall alter the docket to reflect that Defendant “Lucky Abulimen”
is properly “Lucky Abhulimen.”
The Clerk of Court shall alter the docket to reflect that Defendant “J. McKenney” is
properly “Gregory McKinney.”
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Lucky Abhulimen, James Hamilton, and
Gregory McKinney are DISMISSED with prejudice.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 4th day of December, 2014.
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?