Branstetter v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation

Filing 2

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER transferring this case to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota to be consolidated into In Re: Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2441. Signed by Jeffery N. Luthi, Clerk of the Panel, on 1/6/14. (kpr)

ffirerilil8$'41ffiffi@1@S#H43

@e

L or 2

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: STRYKII,R RnJtivllNA'I'E ANt) AIIG
rT'lP TVTT'TANT PROI}TJ CTS LIABILilTY
LITTGA'I'ION

ll
MDt. No. 2441

(sEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSF',ER ORDER (CTO -27)
tJnited states District court lbr the
on June T2,z0r3,the panel transferred 28 civil action{s) to the prooee-dings pursuant to ?8 ti'S'C'
j#ilrclinatecl or r,r"roridatecipretrial
Districr of lv{innes,;;;
piv{.L zoi:J. si"*e that'tirne,ztsz addition.rl action(s) have been
$t407. ,See _F.suppfi_ ii
court, all such actions have been
transferred to the District of Minnesota. wittr the consent oftthat
assignecl [o the Honorable Donovan W Frank'

that are

of firct
It appears that the action(s).on this oonditional trarrsfer order involve questions
of Minnesr:la antl assigned to Judge
commorl ro the u.tion* piiiiously ttu"il"ri*J io the District
Frank.

i&fr,q:'113'i"ili,i'Gi;
?l,tt;t;f ,fJ:3]..:ill;
ffi-i['tr'ffi}#;h.H;#'";;-.li;-th-il"-'nl;ji*i|2,20|3,ancl,withtheconsentof
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 oI the

ffi;;;;"s'signed

to the Honorable Donovan W Frank'

the clerk o{ the tJnited states
This order does not become eff'ective until it is lilecl in the olllice of
to said clerk shall be
District Court lbr the District of Minnesota. The transmittal of this orcler with the Clerk of the
files a notice of opposition
sta,vecl ? 4ays trorn'itie-errtryiiri;-;i li:;t;-;ty
lie continued until lurther order of the Panel'
panel within tlds 7-<tay p.ii<,d, the stay- wili

FOR THE PANEL:

,^
r!1".
oi ili':
l''l

GH.l:ir

;

r"

. *.*-"'-

_,!-,

l' ,c.t.':;

';}y

'

t

I

'i3,i

.

''-*':-*'

r'

F'

'I

t,

li

ll

I

N. Liithi
Clerk of the Panel
Je11ery

effiil&S41Kl1bfl@1-F6$e+2

IN RE: STRYKER RE.'UVENATE AND ABG
HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITICATTON

2 oI2

@e

II
MDL No. 2441

SCHEDULE CTO*27 * TAG*ALONG ACTIONS

I}IST

ntY.

C"A.NO.

q,{SE CAPTLON

ARKANSAS EASTERN

v. [ {or,vmerli ca O steon i c s Corpo ration
Dwf lFrsl

13"-{JQ727

ARh,

Branstette r

13-01583

Fabry v. Stryker Corporation et al

Itcvll

iLLINOIS CENTR-^.L

1

ILC
n.l,lN0lS

|'l

lScv3o DuFltLN

OR]'t:tlrRN

ILN

I

3-09015

Bonebrake v. Ho'ramredica Oster:nics Corp' et al'

11cvj\ Dwrlrcry

KANSAS
t3*02644

KS

Criswell v. Howmedipa Osteonics Corptrration

lYcu

32

DwFf

Fu{

OII.F,GON

OR
OR
OR
OR

1

I
1

1

t3-a2224
13*A2227
13-$2234
13*02235

n-a2n9

()R.

1

OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR

3

olt

fr

t3-02237
n^"a2244

OR

6

n-a2244

I

-5

13-A2225
13-0?228
13^02229

-')

t3*0223r

a

J

13*"02232
a

;
-l
6

t3-02233
t3-02236
13*i)2238

Annis v. Stryker Ciorporation et ai I tcv33 Dr''r/{LNl
DeBen-v r'. Stryker Corporation et al f tcv3+ Ur^rfl|L,!.
D-wp/Ft'N
Menicucci v. Stryker Corporation et al i+c"35
c DwFf rtFl
-i t4r. f
Nl*yer v. str-r'ker
"L
D"tlf:N- ,
Smith v" Stryker Corporation et al Jtt,,?].
gue
Cnrtin v. Stryker Coiporation et al l * cvJ.t
DuFlf ut't
Dobbs v. Stryker Coioratkrn et al ilcv
!w6f FuN
Iroster v. stryker corporation et al
Geist v. Stry'ker Ciorporation et al ltcv $l nuc i
.
v. Stryker: Clorpor;ition et al f +q4a-1'6lruN
f{amilton
Du'Ff FLN
,-.
Hunt r,. Stryker Corporaiiou et al lLtcvtt€
et al
orlanilini v. Stryker Corpor:atiotr
Skogen v. Stryker Lrorporation et al l+ tYt-S Plo-t,eji'
Dul r lFt t I
Paclilla v. Stryker Corporation et al I tcv
tl? Dwe/puN
d/
Spurge<x v. Str'--r'ker Cerrporation et al
cvtf Dtlc f r tN
Lrtzir v. Stryker Corpcration et al

c;{p;i;"

3j
ltcvttd

l,!u)

r$

ittt"tt.9::ll:tJ

lt

lt

96

I