Fatemi v. Rahn et al
Filing
38
JUDGMENT: The University of Arkansas is dismissed with prejudice as a defendant. Dr. Fatemi's 1981 and equal protection claims are dismissed without prejudice. Dr. Fatemi's due process claim is dismissed with prejudice. Dr. Fatermi's retaliation claims under Title VII, the First Amendment, and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/12/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
NASRIN FATEMI
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 4:13-cv-742-DPM
DAN RAHN, in his official capacity;
DEBRA FISER, in her official and individual
capacities; JOHN DAY, in his official and
individual capacities; VERA CHENAULT,
in her individual capacity; UNIVERSITY OF
ARKANSAS; and UNIVERSITY OF
ARKANSAS BOARD OF TRUSTEES
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
1. The University of Arkansas is dismissed with prejudice as a
defendant.
2. Dr. Fatemi' s ยง 1981 and equal protection claims are dismissed
without prejudice.
3. Dr. Fatemi' s due process claim is dismissed with prejudice.
4. Dr. Fatemi' s retaliation claims under Title VII, the First Amendment,
and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act are dismissed with prejudice.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
IJ. ~~~My
I
;wt:r
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?