Fatemi v. Rahn et al

Filing 38

JUDGMENT: The University of Arkansas is dismissed with prejudice as a defendant. Dr. Fatemi's 1981 and equal protection claims are dismissed without prejudice. Dr. Fatemi's due process claim is dismissed with prejudice. Dr. Fatermi's retaliation claims under Title VII, the First Amendment, and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/12/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION NASRIN FATEMI v. PLAINTIFF No. 4:13-cv-742-DPM DAN RAHN, in his official capacity; DEBRA FISER, in her official and individual capacities; JOHN DAY, in his official and individual capacities; VERA CHENAULT, in her individual capacity; UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS; and UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS BOARD OF TRUSTEES DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT 1. The University of Arkansas is dismissed with prejudice as a defendant. 2. Dr. Fatemi' s ยง 1981 and equal protection claims are dismissed without prejudice. 3. Dr. Fatemi' s due process claim is dismissed with prejudice. 4. Dr. Fatemi' s retaliation claims under Title VII, the First Amendment, and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act are dismissed with prejudice. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge IJ. ~~~My I ;wt:r

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?