Bigelow-Wells et al v. Bradley et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS pltf's claims against defts Bradley, Murray, Dunham, Daughterty, Smith, Boener and Angerman are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith 8 . Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 5/28/14. (tjb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/29/2014: # 1 Main Document - Correct) (thd).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
CRYSTAL BIGELOW-WELLS
VS.

PLAINTIFF
4:14-CV-00043-BRW-JJV

SCOTT BRADLEY; et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. I adopt the
Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings
in all respects.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Bradley, Murray, Dunham,
Daughterty, Smith, Boener, and Angerman are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state
a claim upon which relief may be granted. I certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from this
Order would not be taken in good faith.1
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of May, 2014.

/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

See, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
1