Clay v. Shock

Filing 7

ORDER denying 5 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Within thirty days of this Order's entry date, plaintiff must either pay this Court the $505 filing fee or file with the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit a motion w ith an attached affidavit that complies with each mandate of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(1). Plaintiff is further directed to file any future documents or pleadings related to his appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/18/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION CAESAR CLAY, ADC #121781 v. PLAINTIFF No. 4:14CV00066 JLH ANDY SHOCK DEFENDANT ORDER Caesar Clay, an inmate at the Arkansas Department of Correction’s Randall Williams Correctional Facility, has filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, appealing the dismissal of his complaint (docket entry #6), along with a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (docket entry #5). However, because the Court, in its order and judgment dismissing the case (docket entries #3 and #4), certified that any appeal would be frivolous and not in good faith, the motion will be denied. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (docket entry #5) is DENIED. 2. Within thirty (30) days of this order’s entry date, plaintiff must either: (a) pay to this Court the $505.00 appellate filing and docketing fees; or (b) file, with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, a motion with an attached affidavit that complies with each mandate of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(1). 3. Plaintiff is directed to file any future documents or pleadings related to his appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. DATED this 18th day of March, 2014. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?