Huffman et al v. Bradshaw et al

Filing 21

ORDER adopting 18 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and for failure to respond to the Court's order. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 6/9/2014. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
MICHAEL JAMES HUFFMAN et al.

V.

PLAINTIFFS

4:14CV00088 SWW

BRIAN BRADSHAW et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all
respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply

with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and for failure to respond to the Court’s order.
2.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and

judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 9th day of June, 2014.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE