Barner et al v. Thompson/Center Arms Company Inc et al
Filing
22
ORDER denying as moot 10 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 04/01/2014. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
MARK BARNER; and
CHARLOE BARNER,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
THOMPSON/CENTER ARMS COMPANY,
INC.; THOMPSON/CENTER ARMS
COMPANY, LLC; JOHN DOES NOS. 1-10;
AND JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS
NOS. 1-10,
Defendants.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
No. 4:14-cv-00090-SWW
ORDER
On March 7, 2014, defendants Thompson/Center Arms Company, Inc. and
Thompson/Center Arms Company, LLC filed a motion [doc.#10] to dismiss plaintiffs’
complaint. Subsequently, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint [doc.#19]. As “[i]t is
well-established that an amended complaint supercedes an original complaint and renders
the original complaint without legal effect,” In re Wireless Tel. Fed. Cost Recovery Fees
Litig., 396 F.3d 922, 928 (8th Cir. 2005), defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied without
prejudice as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of April 2014.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?