Miller v. Felts et al
ORDER ADOPTING 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendationsof Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to re-file after exhaustion of his available remedies. This dismissal is considered a "strike" within the meaning of the PLRA. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action is not taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/15/2014. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JOHN FELTS, et al.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Plaintiff's complaint against defendants is DISMISSED without prejudice to re-file
after exhaustion of his available remedies.
This dismissal is considered a “strike” within the meaning of the PLRA.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action is not taken in good faith.
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of April, 2014.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?