McCall v. Tucker et al

Filing 69

ORDER adopting 65 Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects. Mr. McCall's excessive force claim against Defendant Matthew Tucker and his deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Matthew Tucker and James Mitchell are DISMISSED, with prejudice. The Clerk is ordered to administratively terminate the case. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 8/14/2015. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
JAMIE SHAWN MCCALL,
ADC # 610019
V.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 4:14CV00212 SWW/BD

MATTHEW TUCKER, et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The Court has received a Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) filed by
Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, Mr.
McCall’s timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court
concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as
this Court’s findings in all respects.1
Mr. McCall’s excessive force claim against Defendant Matthew Tucker and his
deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Matthew Tucker and James Mitchell
are DISMISSED, with prejudice. The Clerk is ordered to administratively terminate the
case.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of August, 2015.

/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

In line two of the first full paragraph on page 8 of the Recommended Disposition, the sentence
should read “Defendant Tucker states that Mr. McCall ....”.