Odom v. Brainsteder et al

Filing 48

ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects 37 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition; and granting Defendants Sam Griffin and the Saline Court Defendants' 27 motion for summar y judgment. Mr. Odum's claims against Mr. Griffin and the Saline County Does are dismissed with prejudice. The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Ronnie Branstetter, Ashley Collier, and Andrew Goodman 30 is granted in part and den ied in part. The Court dismisses with prejudice Mr. Odom's claims regarding conditions at the Garland County Detention Center and dismisses without prejudice Mr. Odom's claims against Mr. Branstetter and Ms. Collier. The Court denies the motion for summary judgment with respect to Mr. Odom's inadequate medical care claim against Mr. Goodman. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/18/2015. (ljb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
CHARLES P. ODOM
ADC #136145
v.

PLAINTIFF

Case No: 4:14-cv-00313 KGB/HDY

RONNIE BRANSTETTER, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 37). Plaintiff Charles
Odom filed a response to the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition, stating
that he “is satisfied with the Courts [sic] Recommendations” (Dkt. No. 39). After carefully
considering Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition, the Court approves and
adopts in their entirety the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this
Court's findings in all respects.
Therefore, the Court orders that:
1.

The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Sam Griffin and the
Saline County Defendants (Dkt. No. 27) is granted, and Mr. Odom’s claims
against Mr. Griffin and the Saline County Does are dismissed with prejudice.

2.

The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Ronnie Branstetter,
Ashley Collier, and Andrew Goodman (Dkt. No. 30) is granted in part and denied
in part.

The Court dismisses with prejudice Mr. Odom’s claims regarding

conditions at the Garland County Detention Center and dismisses without
prejudice Mr. Odom’s claims against Mr. Branstetter and Ms. Collier. The Court

denies the motion for summary judgment with respect to Mr. Odom’s inadequate
medical care claim against Mr. Goodman.
SO ORDERED this 18th day of May, 2015.

_______________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge

2