Jackson v. Jones et al
Filing
17
ORDER adopting 11 Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendants Graham, Pengaricano, Shaffer, Leryea and Liudmilan are DISMISSED without prejudice due to Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against them. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/8/2015. (ks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
MICHELLE DOREEN JACKSON,
ADC #704376
Plaintiff,
v.
WOODY JONES; et al.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
No. 4:14CV00348-SWW-JTR
Defendants.
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Ray. No objections have been filed.1
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety
as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants Graham, Pengaricano, Shaffer, Leryea and Liudmilan are
DISMISSED without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief
can be granted against them.
2.
1
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma
Plaintiff has, however, filed a Third Amended Complaint [doc.#13].
1
pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 8th day of January 2015.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?